<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodbye twitter summary posts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sprignaturemoves.com/blog/goodbye-twitter-summary-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sprignaturemoves.com/blog/goodbye-twitter-summary-posts/</link>
	<description>what others do with talent, I do with obstinate fixation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:46:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Sheneman</title>
		<link>http://sprignaturemoves.com/blog/goodbye-twitter-summary-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Sheneman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sprignaturemoves.com/blog/?p=3213#comment-487</guid>
		<description>God bless your social networking heart!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God bless your social networking heart!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wvpv</title>
		<link>http://sprignaturemoves.com/blog/goodbye-twitter-summary-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>wvpv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sprignaturemoves.com/blog/?p=3213#comment-488</guid>
		<description>I think buzz was the catalyst for my decision. it&#039;s full duplicate and therefore worthless posts from other networks -- especially if you follow people that blog, are on twitter or use google reader heavily.  One tech guy in particular was very vocal about not including tweets in buzz.  
 
 that got me thinking... 
 
It&#039;s a fine line, especially from an SEO perspective, because legit link popularity leads to traffic.  that&#039;s cool, but not really that important to me. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think buzz was the catalyst for my decision. it&#039;s full duplicate and therefore worthless posts from other networks &#8212; especially if you follow people that blog, are on twitter or use google reader heavily.  One tech guy in particular was very vocal about not including tweets in buzz.  </p>
<p> that got me thinking&#8230; </p>
<p>It&#039;s a fine line, especially from an SEO perspective, because legit link popularity leads to traffic.  that&#039;s cool, but not really that important to me. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://sprignaturemoves.com/blog/goodbye-twitter-summary-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sprignaturemoves.com/blog/?p=3213#comment-489</guid>
		<description>A very VERY smart move. I unsubscribed from your blog for probably 6 months because I got sick of seeing your tweets.  
 
So thank you! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very VERY smart move. I unsubscribed from your blog for probably 6 months because I got sick of seeing your tweets.  </p>
<p>So thank you! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

