<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Things I&#8217;d like to see Google improve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sprignaturemoves.com/blog/things-id-like-to-see-google-improve/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sprignaturemoves.com/blog/things-id-like-to-see-google-improve/</link>
	<description>what others do with talent, I do with obstinate fixation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:46:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 - Social Media - Internet News - Blogging &#187; Things I’d like to see Google improve</title>
		<link>http://sprignaturemoves.com/blog/things-id-like-to-see-google-improve/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 - Social Media - Internet News - Blogging &#187; Things I’d like to see Google improve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 04:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sprignaturemoves.com/blog/2007/11/25/things-id-like-to-see-google-improve/#comment-257</guid>
		<description>[...] Marilynn Mobley wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptGoogle Image Search - Are they ever going to improve it? I’m hardly using it anymore. Why? Because it’s crap. I want to search for images by size. AltaVista’s image search is much better. Sorry, but the Image Labeler isn’t going to make &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marilynn Mobley wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptGoogle Image Search &#8211; Are they ever going to improve it? I’m hardly using it anymore. Why? Because it’s crap. I want to search for images by size. AltaVista’s image search is much better. Sorry, but the Image Labeler isn’t going to make &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

